01 SEP 2011 by ideonexus

 Myth VS Science

The difference between myth and science is the difference between divine inspiration of 'unaided reason' (as Bertrand Russell put it) on the one hand and theories developed in observational contact with the real world on the other. It is the difference between the belief in prophets and critical thinking, between Credo quia absurdum (I believe because it is absurd–Tertullian) and De omnibus est dubitandum (Everything should be questioned–Descartes). To try to write a grand cosmical drama ...
Folksonomies: science debate conflict myth
Folksonomies: science debate conflict myth
 1  1  notes

A great quote by Hannes Alfvén on the lines between empiricism and intuitive reasoning.

01 SEP 2011 by ideonexus

 "Natural Philosophy" Renamed "Science"

We should remember that there was once a discipline called natural philosophy. Unfortunately, this discipline seems not to exist today. It has been renamed science, but science of today is in danger of losing much of the natural philosophy aspect.
  1  notes

Hannes Alfvén pointing out the increasing specialization of science during the century to explain the resistance to his ideas

01 SEP 2011 by ideonexus

 Do Not Attempt to Reconcile Science and Religion

Since religion intrinsically rejects empirical methods, there should never be any attempt to reconcile scientific theories with religion. [An infinitely old universe, always evolving may not be compatible with the Book of Genesis. However, religions such as Buddhism get along without having any explicit creation mythology and are in no way contradicted by a universe without a beginning or end.] Creatio ex nihilo, even as religious doctrine, only dates to around AD 200. The key is not to confu...
Folksonomies: religion spirituality
Folksonomies: religion spirituality
  1  notes

Quote by Hannes Alfvén on religion's rejection of empirical methods.