01 SEP 2011 by ideonexus
Myth VS Science
The difference between myth and science is the difference between divine inspiration of 'unaided reason' (as Bertrand Russell put it) on the one hand and theories developed in observational contact with the real world on the other. It is the difference between the belief in prophets and critical thinking, between Credo quia absurdum (I believe because it is absurd–Tertullian) and De omnibus est dubitandum (Everything should be questioned–Descartes). To try to write a grand cosmical drama ...A great quote by Hannes Alfvén on the lines between empiricism and intuitive reasoning.
01 SEP 2011 by ideonexus
"Natural Philosophy" Renamed "Science"
We should remember that there was once a discipline called natural philosophy. Unfortunately, this discipline seems not to exist today. It has been renamed science, but science of today is in danger of losing much of the natural philosophy aspect.Hannes Alfvén pointing out the increasing specialization of science during the century to explain the resistance to his ideas
01 SEP 2011 by ideonexus
Do Not Attempt to Reconcile Science and Religion
Since religion intrinsically rejects empirical methods, there should never be any attempt to reconcile scientific theories with religion. [An infinitely old universe, always evolving may not be compatible with the Book of Genesis. However, religions such as Buddhism get along without having any explicit creation mythology and are in no way contradicted by a universe without a beginning or end.] Creatio ex nihilo, even as religious doctrine, only dates to around AD 200. The key is not to confu...Folksonomies: religion spirituality
Folksonomies: religion spirituality
Quote by Hannes Alfvén on religion's rejection of empirical methods.